Legal Opinion

Miotke v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1984No. 49448-7PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This appeal arises from litigation which followed the discharge of raw sewage into the Spokane River. The trial court awarded plaintiffs, the owners of waterfront property, a total of $245,000 in damages and $88,500 in attorney fees. Defendants, City of Spokane and the Department of Ecology, appealed the awards of both damages and attorney fees, and plaintiffs cross-appealed, seeking increased damages and attorney fees.

This case raises a plethora of issues, many of them novel, at least in this jurisdiction. Stated simply, however, the most important question raised by the appeal is whether…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Mason v. BittonWashington Supreme Court · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API