Gillam v. City of Centralia
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.
This is an action to recover compensation for damage to real property, by deprivation of access, light, and air, caused by the construction of a viaduct, or overcrossing, to separate the grade of a certain street in the city of Centraba from the grade of an intersecting railroad. The court, after trial without a jury, entered findings, conclusions, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant city has appealed.
In the lower court, by demurrer and by answer, the issue was raised that the action had not been commenced within the time limited by law. That is the principal question…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Island Lime Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Guye v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Crowe & Co. v. Adkinson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Vern J. Oja & Associates v. Washington Park Towers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Brooks Investment Co. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Hoover v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.