Legal Opinion

Gillam v. City of Centralia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1942No. 28710PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

This is an action to recover compensation for damage to real property, by deprivation of access, light, and air, caused by the construction of a viaduct, or overcrossing, to separate the grade of a certain street in the city of Centraba from the grade of an intersecting railroad. The court, after trial without a jury, entered findings, conclusions, and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant city has appealed.

In the lower court, by demurrer and by answer, the issue was raised that the action had not been commenced within the time limited by law. That is the principal question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Island Lime Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State ex rel. Guye v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Crowe & Co. v. Adkinson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Vern J. Oja & Associates v. Washington Park Towers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Brooks Investment Co. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Hoover v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API