Legal Opinion

Sigurdson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1956No. 33341PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

In 1936, the works progress administration, a Federal agency, constructed and installed a drainage system on property owned by King county, located in Seattle between Alki avenue and the intersection of Sunset avenue and West Seattle street. The system extends westward from a spring below Sunset avenue, and empties into Puget Sound. After the drainage system was constructed, the maintenance thereof was assumed by the city.

The terrain at the base of the drain, from Alki avenue east, is comparatively level for one hundred twenty feet, the depth of Lena Sigurdson’s lot, except that, near the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. James v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Woodward v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Georges v. TudorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Hamilton v. State Farm InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API