Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Doris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1999No. SCBD 4400PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavender, J.

¶ 1 Complainant, the Oklahoma Bar Association brought disciplinary proceedings against respondent, Daniel Doris, under Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, as amended. A Professional Responsibility Tribunal trial panel found violations of the RGDP and the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (ORPC), 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 3-A, as amended, and recommends disbarment. After de novo review, we find respondent guilty of numerous acts of misconduct and the appropriate discipline is disbarment. We also hold respondent should pay the costs of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API