State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Todd
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
Complainant, the Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) charged respondent, Kenneth V. Todd with misconduct warranting discipline. We hold the OBA did not prove by clear and convincing evidence Todd engaged in deceitful or fraudulent conduct toward an opposing party, but the OBA did prove he engaged in deceitful or fraudulent conduct in presentation of evidence to a tribunal to obtain a default judgment.1 Such misconduct warrants a six (6) month suspension from the practice of law.
In attorney disciplinary proceedings this Court’s determinations are made de novo. State ex rel.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McMillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. WhitebookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.