State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Giger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? 1 and (2) Is a suspension from the practice of law for one year with a two-year conditioned supervision (the latter to run concurrently from the effective date of the suspension's beginning) an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
{2 On 28…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SchraederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.