Tin Originals, Inc. v. Colonial Tin Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict in favor of defendants on the issue of fiduciary duty. Additionally, plaintiff asserts that on remand the jury should be instructed that the basis for plaintiff’s Chapter 75 claim is breach of fiduciary duty. Finally, plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in accepting the jury’s verdict. We are not persuaded and find no error in the trial court.
I. Directed Verdict.
A motion for directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure presents the question of whether…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Arnold v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Broussard v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Kaplan v. O.K. Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Crumley & Associates, P.C. v. Charles Peed & Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- South Atlantic Ltd. Partnership v. RieseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Highland Paving Co. v. First BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.