Arnold v. Sharpe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
A motion for a directed verdict pursuant to Rule 50(a) presents the same question as did a motion for nonsuit prior to the adoption of the New Rules of Civil Procedure. The question is whether the evidence presented is sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971). In passing on this motion, the trial judge must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant, and conflicts in the evidence together with inferences which may be drawn from it must be resolved in favor of the non-movant. The motion may…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Stewart v. Nation-Wide Check CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Pentuff v. . ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Pentuff v. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Renwick v. News & Observer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Ellis v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.