Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Conrad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1960No. 378PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RodmáN, J.

Before passing on questions presented by the appeal, we must dispose of procedural questions raised by the parties.

To fix the amount which the court should award as alimony pendente lite and for counsel fees, the parties relied on documentary evidence consisting of the complaint, affidavits, and the transcript of the adverse examination of defendant. Based on this evidence the court found that defendant was capable of earning $16,000 per year, and on this finding required defendant to pay plaintiff $600 per month and $1000 for attorneys’ fees.

Upon the rendition of the judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Keith v. WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Jenkins v. . CastelloeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Gasque v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API