Legal Opinion

Collingwood v. Kansas Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 25, 1957No. 40,334PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

On May 15, 1957, we granted a rehearing in Moore v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 181 Kan. 51, 310 P. 2d 199, and ordered that the case be rebriefed and reargued at the June 1957 session, limited to the single question of whether separate appeals of owners of separate interests in the same tract of land who appeal from an award of appraisers in an eminent domain proceeding should bé tried as a single action by one jury, or as separate actions by separate juries. On that same day we entered an order recalling the mandate of this court issued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Collingwood v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kettler v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. City of Wichita v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Martin v. Forestry, Fish and Game CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Kansas Homes Development Co. v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. State Highway Commission v. HembrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API