Legal Opinion
Moore v. Kansas Turnpike Authority
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided April 6, 1957No. 40,335PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hall, J.:
This is a condemnation appeal.
The Kansas Turnpike Authority instituted an eminent domain proceeding by virtue of its authority under the provisions of G. S. 1949, 26-102, et seq., as authorized by G. S. 1955 Supp., 68-2006. The proceeding involved several tracts of land including the three tracts in this appeal.
The three tracts of land involved in this appeal were owned by the appellee Ora Ethel Moore, subject to a lease to Perry Jones for the production of limestone products and road rock and the farm tenancy of Raymond G. Rriggs. The entire…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Newton Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Randle v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Jenkins v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Martin v. Forestry, Fish and Game CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.