Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Hembrow

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1963No. 43,043PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

In this original action the plaintiff, State Highway Commission, seeks a writ of mandamus against the defendants as judges of the district court of Dickinson County, commanding them to set aside the order of reference for trial of issues of law and fact in the case of The Abilene Country Club v. The State Highway Commission, No. 15,192, and to grant plaintiff a jury trial on the amount of damages to be awarded the owner for the tailing of private property for public use.

On February 12, 1962, an alternative writ of mandamus was issued…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sutton v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. State v. Boicourt Hunting Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Estey v. HoldrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Dotson v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. City of Wellington v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. State Highway Commission v. BullardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. Muck, Administratrix v. ClaflinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API