Legal Opinion

Martin v. Forestry, Fish and Game Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1959No. 41,726PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

The state forestry, fish and game commission commenced a proceeding in eminent domain to condemn 480 acres of land for which the court-appointed appraisers made a total award in the sum of $108,985.50 apportioned in the following amounts to the interests indicated:

Record Fee Owners

Anna Frances Martin and spouse, James R. Martin, (%)................................$33,748.33

Alice Clare Fager and spouse, C. E. Fager, (%)................................... 33,748.33

Patricia R. O’Brien Rice, and spouse, David W. Rice,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Polzin v. National Cooperative Refinery Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Polzin v. National Cooperative Refinery Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Thompson v. Groendyke Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Moore v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dotson v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. National Reserve Life Insurance v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Bammes v. Viking Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. City of Wellington v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Krehbiel v. JuhnkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API