Legal Opinion

City of Wichita v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 30, 1997No. 77,684, 77,685PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This first impression case arises from a condemnation initiated by the City of Wichita (City) to acquire land for its $6 million ice rink project. The issues are tied together in a land acquisition Gordian knot. Our task is to resolve the controversy without harming established concepts of eminent domain law. In doing so, we untie rather than arbitrarily cut the knot.

The City appeals two orders entered by the district court. In the first order, after the properly owner R.E.M. Properties (REM) appealed the initial condemnation award, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Hudson v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. State v. Boicourt Hunting Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  5. Steck v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Building Contractors, L.L.C. v. Board of Shawnee County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Hickman Trust v. City of Clay CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. Bonanza, Inc. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. City of Roeland Park v. Jasan TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API