Legal Opinion

Moore v. Kansas Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 25, 1957No. 40,335PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.:

This matter is before the court on rehearing. It was previously considered and is reported in 181 Kan. 51, 310 P. 2d 199.

Since this is a rehearing, it would serve no uséful purpose to recite the extensive facts of the case. They are reported in the previous decision and reference is made thereto.

Suffice it is that this case is a condemnation appeal involving a *842single 160 acre parcel of land. After appropriate appeals to the district court from the award of the appraisers a motion was filed by the Kansas Turnpike Authority to consolidate the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Newton Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Eisenring v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. Jenkins v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Martin v. Forestry, Fish and Game CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API