Legal Opinion
Collingwood v. Kansas Turnpike Authority
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided April 6, 1957No. 40,334PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
The Kansas Turnpike Authority, hereafter referred to as the Authority, instituted eminent domain proceedings under G. S. 1949, Ch. 26, Art. 1 (amended by Laws 1953, Ch. 200, § 1; G. S. 1955 Supp. 26-102), as authorized by G. S. 1955 Supp. 68-2006 and 68-413, by filing its petition in the district court in case No. 12,924 to have certain lands condemned for turnpike purposes.
James H. Collingwood, the appellee, hereafter referred to as the landowner, was the owner of a 157.50-acre farm subject to an oral farm lease to J. E. Collingwood,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Searcy v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Casner v. Common School District No. 7Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Case v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Wing v. Mid-Continent Seeds, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoy v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Kettler v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- City of Wichita v. MeyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Martin v. Forestry, Fish and Game CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Collingwood v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.