Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Wall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1937No. 27368PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.

This action is in the nature of a suit for ejectment and to quiet title. It was commenced on October 22, 1935, by Pauline Wall against A. W. Reynolds and wife to enjoin the latter from using a portion of a residential lot in the city of Tulsa and to quiet title to the same in the plaintiff and for damages for certain injuries to said premises alleged to have been commuted by the defendants.

The trial court rendered judgment generally in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff and defendants are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. ImlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Roetzel v. RuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Inman v. Western Nat. Bank of Ft. WorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Herse v. MazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Lake Ex Rel. Benton v. CrosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Rocher v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Kasner v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API