Legal Opinion

Roetzel v. Rusch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1935No. 22943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in ejectment by way of cross-petition by defendant in error, Henry Rusch, Sr., defendant in the case in the lower court, against plaintiff in error, Joe P. Roetzel, plaintiff below, for the recovery of the south 1% feet of lot 10, block 40 in the city of Okeene, Blaine county, Okla., and for damages, rents and profits, coupled with a prayer for general relief. The parties will be referred to as below.

At the conclusion of the trial, each of the parties separately moved the court to withdraw the case from the jury and to decide the case in his favor, on the theory that there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp. v. Keyokla Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Stanfield v. LincolnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Reynolds v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Lake Ex Rel. Benton v. CrosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Keel v. CoveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Dwelle v. GreenshieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API