Legal Opinion
Kasner v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 1954No. 35572PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
> O’NEAL, Justice.
From the judgment granting Joanna Reynolds a mandatory injunction the defendants, M. Kasner and Irene Kasner, appeal. . ■ -
The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
■ The facts are not in substantial dispute. The parties entered into a Stipulation which discloses that the plaintiff is the owner of Lot 3 and the west 11½ feet of lot 4, in Block 1, in Knott & Gillespie’s Addition to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; that the defendants- are the owners- of the north 40 feet of lots. 1 and -2 in block 1, in said addition, and that each of said lots are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Golden Press, Inc. v. RylandsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Nebel v. GuyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Reynolds v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Inman v. Western Nat. Bank of Ft. WorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- Slocum v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Malnar v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Russell v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
- Neff v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.