Legal Opinion

Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. Imler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1927No. 17600PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Eor convenience the parties will herein be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs, defendants in error here, brought suit against defendant, plaintiff in error here, in the district court of Tulsa county, praying for injunctive relief, the subject-matter of the action being a strip of land about 18 inches wide across the corner of plaintiffs’ residence lot and the question involved being the exact location of the boundary line between the properties of plaintiffs and defendant. A temporary injunction was granted plaintiffs and defendant appealed to this court, where the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. New Mexico v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Coleman v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Etchen v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. ImlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lewis v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Francis v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Reynolds v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Lake Ex Rel. Benton v. CrosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Keel v. CoveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API