Legal Opinion

Burns v. Bastien

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1935No. 24351PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced in the district court of Garfield county by Katherine M. Burns against George DBastien, Lillie M. Bastien, Charles Bastien, and the unknown heirs, executors, etc., of Eugene L. Bastien, deceased, and J. E. Mahoney, for the purpose of quieting title to a one-fourth interest in the oil and gas rights in certain lands in Garfield county. Subsequently, E. E. Mead was made a party defendant upon motion of the defendant Ma-honey. Thereafter an amended petition was filed, in which Katherine M. Burns and E. E. Mead joined as plaintiffs. Subsequent to the trial, the defendant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Herring v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Paxton v. Benedum-Trees Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Toothman v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  5. Duvall v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API