Legal Opinion

Inman v. Western Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 5, 1921No. 10127PublishedCited by 9 opinions

'- Error from District Court, Garvin' County; Alvin Fi P'yeatt, ’ Special Judge." , , Actjon by ,R. A, Inman, administrator, and others ..against .the.-Western, National: Rank, a .corporation,- of Fort Worth, Texas, to cancel deeds,-etc. Judgment,for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLSON, J..

This action was brought in the district court of Garvin county by the plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, against the defendant in error, as defendant below, for the cancellation' of 'a ' guardian’s' ‘ deed and a "deed 'executed. by Nora'Hazel, to the Lindsay National Bank,' ' covering .certain lands,’ in' Garvin county, and for the possession, of s¿id land, and for, rents and profits. We will hereafter refer-to. the parties-as they appeared in. the -trial court. ■ ■

The- land -involved was allotted to Lpttie Hazel, a Ohoctaw Indian by blood, who died on the, 7th ■ day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Foster v. HoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. State Ex Rel. Lankford, Bank Com'r v. SolissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Cobb v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Reynolds v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Kasner v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API