Legal Opinion

Herse v. Mazza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Antonio Mazza and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the coiinty of Cattaraugus on the 23d day of December, 1903, upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Thbasheb, referee.

All concurred.

■The following is the opinion of Hon. ~W. S. Thbasheb, referee: Thbasheb, Referee':

This action is ejectment to recover of the'defendants a strip of land one foot and six inches wide, On a portion of which stands a brick building erected . by defendants’' immediate grantor. The whole question depends upon the location of the bo'undary line between the lands of the defendants and the adjoining lands of the plaintiffs, who all take from a common grantor,

Alb'the conveyances in both chains- of title described ..the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Root v. StuyvesantNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  3. Reed v. . FarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Singer v. Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Seneca Nation of Indians v. HugaboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Reynolds v. WallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Schmidt v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Schauland v. SchmaltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Dzingle v. KrcilekNebraska Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API