Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Kazantzis

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1947No. Civ. 13489PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from plaintiff’s judgment. The action went to trial in the absence of defendant. On the morning of the date set for trial, November 12, 1946, counsel made a motion for continuance on the ground of the unavoidable absence of the defendant. Notice of time of trial" had béen served on counsel for defendant on October 10, 1946. Counsel’s affidavit showed that he had promptly notified defendant that the case was set for trial and that on October 15 he had received a telegram from defendant advising him that he would not be able to attend the trial on November 12, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Sheldon v. LandwehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lynch v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Beckman v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Mission Film Corp. v. Chadwick Pictures Corp.California Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pacific Magnesium, Inc. v. WestoverDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  2. Whalen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Hansen v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Rabinowitz v. KandelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Gordon v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API