Legal Opinion
Whalen v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1960No. Civ. 24930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem. *
Petitioner seeks mandate to compel the respondent court to vacate its order denying his motion for a continuance of a trial and to require such court to make order granting a continuance until some date after January 1, 1961.
The real party in interest, llene McMillan, commenced action number SM C 7109 on June 25, 1959, against the petitioner for personal injuries alleged to have resulted when she, a pedestrian, was struck by an automobile operated by petitioner. Petitioner's answer, in addition to denying negligence and damage, alleged defenses of contributory negligence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Jaffe v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hays v. ViscomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- McElroy v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Cohen v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Louie Queriolo Trucking, Inc. v. Superior Court of Kern Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Vernon v. Great Western BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Dingwall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.