Legal Opinion
Capital National Bank v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 1944No. Civ. 6911PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Certain parties have appealed on various grounds from a judgment which was rendered against them in the above entitled actions which were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The suits involve title to a quicksilver mine and distribution of the proceeds from the sale thereof. The mine is situated in Lake County and was formerly owned by Alpha Quicksilver Company.
The first action was commenced in 1938 by Sam Ginsberg and Sacramento Pipe Works against Theo. Smith et al. It seeks to partition the quicksilver mine or to sell it ^.nd apportion the proceeds thereof, and also asks for an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Abels v. FreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Alderson v. CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Boas v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Grand v. GriesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Russ-Field Corp. v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- County of San Bernardino v. Doria Mining & Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Schwartz v. Magyar House, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.