Legal Opinion

Rabinowitz v. Kandel

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1969No. Civ. 33772PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, J.

In their third cause of action plaintiffs Rabinowitz and Bernstein, doing business as The Wilshire Company, sought to recover from defendants Maurice Kandel and wife the balance of $9,165.12 due on a $10,000 promissory note dated 1 November 1962.

As an affirmative defense to this third cause of action the Kandels pleaded that on 6 November 1962 plaintiffs orally agreed to accept an assignment of proceeds due the Kandels from a certain escrow in full and complete satisfaction of the $10,000 note, and that such an assignment had been made by defendants and accepted by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Whepley Oil Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Kelly v. David D. Bohannon OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. BII Finance Co. v. U-States Forwarding Services Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. In Re Gcp Ct School Acquisition, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. Modernica, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API