Legal Opinion

Beckman v. Waters

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1911No. L.A. No. 2724PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The controversy between the parties turns principally upon the effect of an instrument, in form a deed absolute, executed by the defendant Waters to plaintiff Beckman, and purporting to convey certain real estate, to wit, the island of San Miguel, containing about fourteen thousand acres of land and situated in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of Santa Barbara County. On the part of the plaintiff the claim was and is that this instrument was in fact what it purported to be, while the defendants contended below, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Ahern v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Badover v. Guaranty Trust Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wright v. RosebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Voorheis v. Hawthorne-Michaels Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API