Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Bernstein
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1952No. Civ. 18611PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him for the recovery of money and also from an order denying his motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to vacate the judgment on the grounds that it was taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect.
The complaint herein, filed in September, 1947, was based upon a promissory note executed and delivered by defendant to one Sophie Lieberman in May, 1943, whereby defendant agreed to pay the sum of $3,500 at the rate of $200 per month commencing July 1, 1943. Plaintiff herein is the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Lynch v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Beckman v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- A & S Air Conditioning v. John J. Moore Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Redevelopment Agency v. TobrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Nahas v. NahhasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955