Lynch v. Superior Court of S.F.
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Mandate to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The application for a writ denied. In denying the application, it is proper to say that the sickness of a party to an action, preventing his attendance on the court, does not ipso facto require the court to grant an application for a continuance, made on his behalf. It is for the trial court in all cases, except where otherwise expressly provided by statute, to determine whether or not the circumstances shown upon an application for a continuance are such as to make it proper that a continuance should be granted, and its conclusion thereon will not be disturbed unless there has been…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Sheldon v. LandwehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Haruko Takeuchi v. SchmuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Bank of Orland v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.