Legal Opinion

Texas Commerce Bank v. Garamendi

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1994No. B071545PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

The question presented is whether, as prevailing parties in a declaratory relief action brought against the Insurance Commissioner as conservator of an insolvent insurance company to challenge the commissioner’s designation of priority status, appellant policyholders are entitled to attorney fees and costs as provided for in their contract with the insurance company. We hold that they are and reverse the trial court’s ruling.

I

Facts and Procedural History

The judgment in favor of appellants was affirmed by Division Four of this district in Texas Commerce Bank v. Garamendi (1992)…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Quackenbush v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Chaparral Greens v. City of Chula VistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Michell v. OlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Wakefield v. BohlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API