Texas Commerce Bank v. Garamendi
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, J.
The question presented is whether, as prevailing parties in a declaratory relief action brought against the Insurance Commissioner as conservator of an insolvent insurance company to challenge the commissioner’s designation of priority status, appellant policyholders are entitled to attorney fees and costs as provided for in their contract with the insurance company. We hold that they are and reverse the trial court’s ruling.
I
Facts and Procedural History
The judgment in favor of appellants was affirmed by Division Four of this district in Texas Commerce Bank v. Garamendi (1992)…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Quackenbush v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Chaparral Greens v. City of Chula VistaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Michell v. OlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Wakefield v. BohlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.