Michell v. Olick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOSSEE, J.
This appeal is from an order granting the motions of both parties to tax costs and declaring that each party must bear his or her own costs. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to award costs to cross-complainant, who prevailed on her cross-complaint.
Facts
Georgia Ann Michell and David R. Olick are both attorneys. From 1991 to 1993, Olick represented Michell in several cases. In 1992 Michell represented Leslie Jobe in a lawsuit, but she was eventually disqualified. She then referred the client to Olick. Michell and Olick orally agreed to split the fees recovered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Syverson v. HeitmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Moss Construction Co. v. WulffsohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- In re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- deSaulles v. Community Hospital of the Monterey PeninsulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.