Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. Bohlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 2006No. H028310PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

This is the second appeal in this civil action, which was brought by plaintiff Ronald Wakefield following his purchase of a home from defendants Jeff and Charlotte Bohlin. In Wakefield’s first appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s disposition of three causes of action in the Bohlins’ favor, two by summary adjudication and one by nonsuit. In this appeal, Wakefield contests the trial court’s postjudgment award of attorney fees and costs to the Bohlins, which was based on the court’s determination that they were prevailing parties.

We conclude that the trial court erred. As we…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Decker v. Tramiel (In Re JTS Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. DintinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Cruz v. AyromlooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API