Legal Opinion
Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
California Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1937No. L. A. 16182; L. A. 16222PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above numbered appeals have been taken by the four named appellants, policyholders of the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California, from an order of the Superior Court in and for the County of Los Angeles, affirming a plan of rehabilitation of that company proposed by the state insurance commissioner pursuant to the provisions of section 1043 of the Insurance Code. (Stats. 1935, chap. 145; Deering’s 1935 Supp. to Codes, Laws and Const. Amendments, Act No. 3748, p. 878.)
In appeal L. A. No. 16182, and solely in connection with appellant Neblett, a motion of respondents…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Shapiro v. WilgusSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Matter of People (Tit. Mtge. Guar. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Gibbes v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Doty v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Kueckelhan v. Federal Old Line InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1966
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.