Legal Opinion

Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alperson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1979No. L.A. 31045PublishedCited by 296 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Plaintiff appeals from judgment awarding defendants $80,500 attorney’s fees. We reverse.

Defendants, shareholders and directors of Titanium Metallurgical, Inc. (TMI), owned and operated a subsidiary, Turner Metals Supply, Inc. (Turner). Plaintiff supplied aluminum goods and products to Turner pursuant to a general line consignment agreement executed in 1971. TMI signed the agreement as guarantor of Turner’s payments. The. agreement contained no provision for recovery of attorney’s fees in the event of breach.

In January 1973, Turner, with TMI as indorser, executed and delivered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Arnold v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by296 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987

291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API