Legal Opinion
Lund v. Keeler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed December 9, 1930:
Fowler, J.(1) That the defendant breached his contract with plaintiff by failing to deliver the stock to her within reasonable time and by negligently allowing the stock purchased to stand as security for his own account with his Chicago broker for so long a time, is apparent. It is also apparent that were the contract between plaintiff and defendant one of sale or for sale by defendant to plaintiff of the stock, these breaches would entitle plaintiff to rescind, as she attempted to do, and entitle her to recover the $2,100 paid to plaintiff.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- In re J. C. Wilson & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Kier v. SteerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vissenberg v. BresnahenWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
- Emmert v. United Bank and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- R. Baruch and Company v. SpringerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Davis v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004