In re J. C. Wilson & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of J. C. Wilson & Co., bankrupts. On objections to report of special master. Approved, except as set forth in opinion, and saving corrections in figures, which master may make, and any necessary recasting of accounts. J. C. Wilson & Co. were stockbrokers doing business in San Francisco-, Cal., with various branch offices in tbe United States and Canada, all of tbe business of tbe branch offices passing through tbe main office at San Francisco.
Read the full summary
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of J. C. Wilson & Co., bankrupts. On objections to report of special master. Approved, except as set forth in opinion, and saving corrections in figures, which master may make, and any necessary recasting of accounts. J. C. Wilson & Co. were stockbrokers doing business in San Francisco-, Cal., with various branch offices in tbe United States and Canada, all of tbe business of tbe branch offices passing through tbe main office at San Francisco. Wilson held seats for tbe benefit of tbe firm in tbe -New York Stock Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, and tbe San…
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The careful and comprehensive report of the special master renders unnecessary reference to many details. It will conduce to a clear understanding to point out in what respects there is agreement or disagreement with the views of the special master in respect of the principles of law involved, making such reference to particular claims as may be illustrative or otherwise regarded as desirable.
The master has allocated the claims of those urging reclamation into two general classes, viz. class A and class B, placing the claims of superior equity in class A,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Frelinghuysen v. NugentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1888
- In re T. A. McIntyre & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- In re EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. United States Sugar Equalization Board, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- In re TooleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Tawney v. ClemsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Blankenhorn-Hunter-Dulin Co. v. ThayerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Pintsch Compressing Co. v. Buffalo Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.