Legal Opinion
Kier v. Steer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1922No. 3844PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is ar- ■ gued in behalf of the trustee that Steer should be held responsible for the increase of the debt due by Mason & Owen to Bogan & Bryan; that such increase was made possible to the extent of $4,775 by the *204Midvale shares, which were included in the stock pledged to Logan & Bryan; and that it was Steer’s act which enabled Mason & Owen to create the added charge, and that Steer should take the stock “subject to the indebtedness incurred in its purchase.”
It is clear to us that the identification of the stock was sufficiently made, for at the time of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- In re J. C. Wilson & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- In re T. A. McIntyre & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blankenhorn-Hunter-Dulin Co. v. ThayerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Griffin v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Sargent v. Whitfield CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Kier v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Lund v. KeelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931