Legal Opinion
Emmert v. United Bank and Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1936No. Civ. 9825PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action for the value of certain shares of stock claimed to have been converted. The complaint, which is in two counts, alleges in substance that plaintiff and Mariah L. Emmert made and delivered to defendant United Bank and Trust Company of California their joint and several promissory note for the sum of $6,000 and as security for the payment of the same plaintiff transferred to the bank all his right, title and interest in and to certain shares of stock the certificate for which, through the carelessness of the bank, was lost. The second cause of action alleges that defendants converted the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Steele v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Thomsen v. Culver City Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hammond v. Du BoisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Chesser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Taylor v. Forte Hotels InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Scott's Valley Fruit Exchange v. Growers Refrigeration Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Boiseau v. MorrissetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.