Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Taggart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 6, 1908No. 197PublishedCited by 84 opinions

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This case was argued and submitted with Henry Richardson, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, v. John. M. Shaw and Alexander Davidson, No. 122, just decided, ante p. 365. To the extent which the case involves the same general questions as to the legal relations of' stockbrokers and customers, we need not repeat the discussion had in Richardson v. Shaw, by which the conclusion was reached that under the usual contract for a speculative purchase of stock the customer is considered the pledgor and the broker the pledgee.

In this case it is necessary to notice certain specific features not arising .in. the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Hewit v. Berlin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Hagan v. Scottish InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Furber v. DaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API