Legal Opinion
R. Baruch and Company v. Springer
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 18, 1962No. 3027PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
In this action a customer sued a stockbroker to recover the amount paid by the customer to the broker for the purchase of certain shares of stock which had not been delivered. Judgment went for the customer and the broker has appealed.
From the evidence (little of which was conflicting) the trial court could have found the following facts. On March 7, 1961, the customer placed an order for 200 shares of stock of Permachem Corporation; on March 8 the broker confirmed the order; and on March 13 the customer paid the broker $490.50. The customer requested that the stock be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tuckerman v. MearnsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
- Krinsky v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Drake-Jones Co. v. DrogsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Lund v. KeelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Connelly v. GlennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blanken v. HARRIS, UPHAM & CO., INCORPORATEDDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Meridian Mortg. Co., Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cope Ford, Inc. v. LastfogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Shearson Lehman Bros. v. M & L InvestmentsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1991