Legal Opinion
Toso v. City of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1980No. Docket Nos. 49261, 49990PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
This is an action filed by Toso individually and as agent of others against the City of Santa Barbara and all members of the city council who held office during the year 1974. The first cause of action seeks inverse condemnation damages under section 1246.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure (now § 1036); the second cause of action seeks damages for inverse condemnation; the third cause of action seeks a writ of mandate to compel the city to grant to Toso a rezoning of the property involved; the fourth claim is in mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085); and the fifth…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Arnel Development Co. v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.