Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In the instant case we confront a question concerning judicial review of adjudicatory determinations of administrative agencies which we were not called upon to reach in Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130 [93 Cal.Rptr. 234, 481 P.2d 242]. That question, whose presence was expressly noted by us in Bixby (id. at p. 137, fn. 2) is this: When, upon judicial review of an administrative order or decision pursuant to section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is claimed there has been a prejudicial abuse of discretion in that the findings are not supported by the evidence,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by404 opinions
- Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.