Legal Opinion

Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1974No. L.A. 30009PublishedCited by 404 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

In the instant case we confront a question concerning judicial review of adjudicatory determinations of administrative agencies which we were not called upon to reach in Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130 [93 Cal.Rptr. 234, 481 P.2d 242]. That question, whose presence was expressly noted by us in Bixby (id. at p. 137, fn. 2) is this: When, upon judicial review of an administrative order or decision pursuant to section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, it is claimed there has been a prejudicial abuse of discretion in that the findings are not supported by the evidence,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by404 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API