Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
In recent decades, the People of California have become painfully aware of the deterioration in the quality and availability of recreational opportunities along the California coastline due to the combined factors of an increasing demand for its use and the simultaneous decreasing supply of accessible land in the coastal zone. Growing public consciousness of the finite quantity and fragile nature of the coastal environment led to the 1972 passage of Proposition 20, an initiative measure entitled the California Coastal Zone Conservation Act (the 1972 Coastal Act). (Former Pub.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by226 opinions
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.