Legal Opinion
City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1986No. Docket Nos. H000282, H001125PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAUER, J.
On June 19, 1984, the County of Monterey (County) Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance rezoning property owned by Mission Ranch Corporation (Mission Ranch). The City of Carmel (City) petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandamus to compel County to set aside its rezoning decision, and on December 12, 1984, the court entered its judgment ordering that the peremptory writ issue. Real party in interest Mission Ranch filed this appeal, claiming that the trial court committed several procedural errors warranting reversal, and that County’s rezoning decision was lawful…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Amador v. El Dorado County Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.