Legal Opinion
Smith v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1990No. A046622PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, J.
Ernest and Alice Smith appeal from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer to their second amended cross-complaint without leave to amend. Appellants attempted to state causes of action against the City and County of San Francisco (the City) for inverse condemnation, promissory estoppel, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, civil rights violations, and breach of oral contract. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
On March 18, 1983, the City filed a complaint in eminent domain against…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Jenkins v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Molecular Analytical Systems v. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- AILANTO PROPERTIES, INC. v. City of Half Moon BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Landucci v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.