Legal Opinion
Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San Diego
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 2006No. E035881PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, Acting P. J.
INTRODUCTION
The City of San Diego (the city) appeals a judgment for inverse condemnation awarding $65.3 million in damages to Border Business Park, Inc. (hereafter sometimes referred to as Border). 2
Border is a real estate development company which was developing a business park in Otay Mesa. Otay Mesa was then an unincorporated area in San Diego County adjacent to the Mexican border, and was later annexed by the city. Border asserted two causes of action for inverse condemnation. The. first arose from the city’s actions in connection with its announcements of a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- James Mills v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- United Grand Corp. v. Malibu Hillbillies, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.