Legal Opinion

Mosesian v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1972No. S.F. No. 22868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one month.

Facts: Petitioner, who was admitted to practice in 1964 and is now 33 years old, has lived in Fresno all his life. His grandmother died in 1955, leaving a considerable estate. Substantial family problems existed, and a feeling of great bitterness developed between petitioner’s father, Suren P. Mosesian (hereinafter referred to as “Suren") and petitioner’s aunt, Bernice Mosesian (hereinafter…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Ridley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McKinney v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Lee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Reznik v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Matter of StumpAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GreshamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Bellm v. BelliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Bellm v. BelliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API