Legal Opinion

Lee v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1970No. L.A. 29636PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation by the State Bar Disciplinary Board that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years on conditions of probation, including actual suspension during the first year.

Petitioner was admitted to practice in this state on January 9, 1962. In late 1964 he was engaged as an attorney by Brink’s, Inc., to collect a debt from Economic Services, dba Walker Oil Company. He was also engaged as an attorney and/or business adviser by William Walker, president of Economic Services and president or primary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ishmael v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API