Legal Opinion

McKinney v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1964No. S.F. 21787PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar of California that petitioner be disbarred from the practice of law.

Questions: First. Does the evidence sustain the finding of culpability on the part of petitionerf

Yes. The burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of the Board of Governors to show that its findings are not supported by the evidence or that its recommendation is erroneous or unlawful. (Di Gaeta v. State Bar, 59 Cal.2d 116, 117 [1] [28 Cal.Rptr. 305, 378 P.2d 577].) In the present ease, the record discloses that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coviello v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brawner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hallinan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Di Gaeta v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Egan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API